<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Fwrap: Python(Cython(C(Fortran)))</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fortrancython.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fortrancython.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Wrap Fortran in C, Cython &#38; Python</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on GSoC est fin, but fwrap lives on! by Max Hoffmann</title>
		<link>http://fortrancython.wordpress.com/2009/08/23/gsoc-est-fin-but-fwrap-lives-on/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Hoffmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortrancython.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Hey,

  This sounds very interesting. I have successfully worked with f2py and I love it but it would be really great to have something with fewer limitations, because I think in many cases the idea is to make legacy code simply accessible without touching the code.

  I think it would be really cool if the wrapper would offer support for source code documentation. E.g. I usually document my source code with robodoc and it would be very nice to have those same function and parameter descriptions available in the python module. Is anyone working on this? What other formalized tools do people use under Fortran?

Best,
Max.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>  This sounds very interesting. I have successfully worked with f2py and I love it but it would be really great to have something with fewer limitations, because I think in many cases the idea is to make legacy code simply accessible without touching the code.</p>
<p>  I think it would be really cool if the wrapper would offer support for source code documentation. E.g. I usually document my source code with robodoc and it would be very nice to have those same function and parameter descriptions available in the python module. Is anyone working on this? What other formalized tools do people use under Fortran?</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Max.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GSoC est fin, but fwrap lives on! by Triernigh</title>
		<link>http://fortrancython.wordpress.com/2009/08/23/gsoc-est-fin-but-fwrap-lives-on/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Triernigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fortrancython.wordpress.com/?p=32#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed reading this post, keep up creating such exciting stuff!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed reading this post, keep up creating such exciting stuff!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
